Censorship VS Kapil Sibal

On 6th of December 2011 the telecom minister Kapil Sibal has asked the internet communities and social networking sites to remove or monitor the controversial contents on the websites. Indirectly now Indian governments trying to withdraw the open rights of press. As per the telecom minister (Indian Government), "it's not true to keep the content which are not controversial for other countries like US, UK, China... we have to keep our social and religious factors in mind."

Kapil Sibal asked to social networking sites like Google, Facebook, Yahoo and Microsoft to monitor the content which are controversial or contain any kind of information about our politicians.
Indian Cyber Officer said that "it's very hard to monitor that type of contents because still there is not such kind of technology which keep tracks of this kind of information."

Isn't that crazy? Now our government is trying to pulling the open rights of internet world. According to Google policy any one can write or post any kind of content which is not illegal according to the local law and which doesn't violates the Google's policies.

Internet is the only world where you can share your thought or feelings about our politician to the world, but Indian government trying to stop us by spreading information about our own country. Mr. Sibal called a press conference just after released of unofficial pictures of congress minister Mrs Sonia Gandhi and prime minister Mr. Manmohan Singh on net.

Several social networking sites gave their reactions: according to Facebook, "We recognize the government interest in minimizing the amount of abusive content that is available online and will continue to engage with the
Indian authorities as they debate this important issue."

Google said that "when the content is illegal it abides by the local law, we removes it. And even where the content is legal but violates our terms and conditions, we take that down too, once we have been notified. However, if the content is legal and does not violates its policies, we will not remove just because of controversial."


Censorship on internet world is the craziest thing we ever heard. So now the thing is that how IS IT POSSIBLE?

FDI in retail. Will it be beneficial?

Recently congress is trying to implement 51% of FDI in retail in Indian market. The bigger question raise here is, will it be beneficial for a common citizen of our country? Well, as per the rule of opposition party they started opposing the bill of FDI proposed by congress. And the government have put FDI on hold for few more days.
But before opposing to the proposed bill we should go through all the points which are in favor and the points which are opposes the bill. One of the congress minister claims that FDI, "immensely help Indian farmers and create jobs in the agricultural and food-processing industry". 
Around half of the Indian population is employed through agriculture and many of them employed through retail market or a small business. So Indian population is afraid of loosing there market. But it's not correct. But the congress government have tried to assuage the countrymen by saying that the alleged companies must also spent $ 100 million half of which is to be invest in back end infrastructure development.
As the bill was proposed in the parliament our great opposition party started opposing the bill. Peoples started protesting against the bill in every city of the country. All the small business persons and many opposition party leader decided to put ("bharat band" ) Indian market closed on Dec 2 2011. Monitoring the situation of the country congress government put FDI on hold for few days. 
As per the beneficial points of FDI it was very use full for Indian citizens as it will provide thousands of jobs to Indian.